1. Longhand Limit
2. Shorthand Limit
3. Adv. Shorthand
No-Limit Hold'em:
1. Intro to NL
2. Advanced NL
3. Who Pays Off
4. Stack Sizes
Omaha:
1. Intro to Omaha
2. Low Limit Omaha
3. Intro to PLO
4. Omaha Hi/Lo
Tournaments:
1. Tourney Overview
2. Single-Table NL
3. Advanced NL STTs
4. Multi-Table NL
5. Multi-Table Limit
6. Tourney Variants
Money Management:
1. Moving Limits
2. When to Quit
3. Short/Long Run
Other:
1. Intermediate Mistakes
2. Utilizing Promotions
PokerTips Blog Recent Posts
| TwoPlusTwo Forums Hacked, Members Advised to Change Passwords |
|
Cory Albertson
April 26
|
| Rumor: Full Tilt Poker Bought by PokerStars |
|
Cory Albertson
April 24
|
| New Sunday Black Friday Poker Rap Song Released |
|
Cory Albertson
April 16
|

PokerTips Newsletter Sign-Up



english
dansk
deutsch
españa
français
italiano
nederlands
norsk
português
suomeksi
svenska
...
...





February 14th, 2012 by Cory Albertson
Last fall, Michael DiVita won a $20,000 seat to an Epic Poker League (EPL) Main Event through a $1,500 Pro/Am satellite. Before he could participate in the tournament, DiVita was confronted by EPL Standards and Committee Chairman Stephen Martin and informed he would not play the Main Event due to a prior sex offender conviction. DiVita initially refused the deal and stated he wanted to play but, as his side of the story goes, was told he would be stopped from playing in a very embarrassing and public fashion. He then demanded his $20,000 seat be awarded to him in cash, but the EPL refused and gave him just $1,500 as a refund for the satellite. DiVita claims Palms security was used to intimidate him into taking the deal.
In the aftermath, DiVita filed a complaint with the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB). The team at QuadJacks.com acquired a memo from the NGCB to George Maloof, President of the Palms Casino Resort which hosts the EPL, dated January 12th of this year. In the memo, the NGCB decided that the EPL wrongfully barred DiVita from play and ordered the Palms Casino to award him $18,500 to compensate for the value of the seat he lost.
This seems like a suitable outcome to the dispute. If the EPL and/or the Palms Casino had an issue with a sex offender participating in their poker tournament, they should have prohibited him from registering or even entering the premises in the first place. Once he won a seat to the Main Event, the $20,000 cash value of the seat should have been credited to him upon the decision to bar him from the tournament. By mishandling this, the EPL and Palms Casino have now allowed a child molester to come off looking like a victim.
Posted in Poker World Commentary | No Comments »